The creative folks over at Wink asked a provocative question that caught my attention a short while back.
What would the trunk of a
tree sound like if a cross-section
were played like an LP?
Well, now. That’s an interesting idea. I pondered this concept for a bit and quickly determined I’d really like to know what it would sound like. Surely a conifer would be different from a palm. The more I postulated about the subject, the more intrigued I became. Humor me.
For long moments I played with the possibilities and worried over potential outcomes, until I got distracted by the thought of the articulation itself.
I wondered if the voice of an ancient tree would be a deep bass intonation. Then after consideration, decided a being who’d lived for such a long time might develop a more mellow, almost warm syncopated rhythm to their cadence. At last, I concluded the millennia old voice of an ancient conifer might be a rich crescendo of sound, snapping with vitality, and aching with accumulated experience. Ready to sing.
Then I noticed the link.
I clicked the button and discovered those wonderful people at Wink, went and answered their own query.
As it turns out, they were showcasing the work of a gentleman named Bartholomaus Traubeck. He’s an artist working in multiple mediums, with a unique perspective on the intersections of technology and perception, and his work is stimulating.
Using an assortment of gadgets and components, Mr. Traubeck has figured out a way to play tree rings like a record. Utilizing a computer, he translates the rings through a musical simulation. The tree rings, as interpreted by this apparatus, generate a haunting piano track.
Here is what Mr. Traubeck had to say about this process:
A tree’s year rings are analysed for their strength, thickness and rate of growth. This data serves as basis for a generative process that outputs piano music. It is mapped to a scale which is again defined by the overall appearance of the wood (ranging from dark to light and from strong texture to light texture). The foundation for the music is certainly found in the defined ruleset of programming and hardware setup, but the data acquired from every tree interprets this ruleset very differently.
Such a fascinating synthesis of music, technology, and nature. I HAD to listen. Give it a try ~
Creepy. Disturbing. Awesome.
Love it. Want it. I know…yes, it’s weird, but…!
I’m fascinated by wanting to know how different the sound is from different trees. Would a younger tree with wider rings sound less complex? Would an older tree with tight rings caused by centuries of deprivation during climactic downcycles make a symphonic variance? I have many questions. I might need to e-mail Mr. Traubeck.
What if the filtering program utilized different instruments? I’d love to know what trees would sound like played on a musical base of a flute, or a harp, or a sitar…maybe even a drum.
What a marvelous invention! Have you discovered any fascinating bits of weirdness lately? Have new voices been making themselves heard in your vicinity?